Research and Reports

Fri, Jul 16, 2004; by Bill Coppinger.

What is Post-Compulsory Education and Training?

Post compulsory education and training concerns education and training for all those of 15 years of age and older. However, young people aged between 15 and 24 have been the main focus of work in the post-compulsory area, for a number of reasons.

Research indicates that if these young people do not make a satisfactory transition from education and training towards sustainable employment by their mid-twenties, they continue to be disadvantaged on many measures, both financial and social . Members of this cohort are also likely to be in most need of effective systemic support. They start with limited experience beyond the school, yet face a complex mix of providers and potential pathways, and must make important decisions at a time of their lives which is often one of rapid personal growth and change.

Finally, the 15-24 year old cohort is the most numerous group in post compulsory education and training, and the subject of targets for improved outcomes articulated by the Government in its Goals and Targets for Education and Training

[Source: Dept. Education and Training]

In this section you will find all of the Central Ranges LLEN's research and project reports.

Also included will be links to key research that informs or adds value to the work of the LLEN.

Kirby Report

In August 2000, the final report of the Ministerial Review of Post Compulsory Education and Training Pathways was released. The Review was chaired by Peter Kirby and is often called the "Kirby Report". You can access the report from these links:

Ministerial Statements relating to Post-Compulsory Education and Training Policy

Research in the Department of Education and Training (DE&T), Department of Victorian Communities and related Authorities

At Risk Students: Who, Why, When?

Dr Deb Hull’s research report highlights appropriate tools or strategies to enable government secondary schools to meet the MIPs accountability requirement of identifying students at risk of disengaging from education and training.

Note: The CRLLEN requested to participate in trials but we understand a larger roll-out is a possibility in 2006/2007

MIPS Mapping Tools

[Source: SofWeb]

Federal Government and External Reports of relevance

Other useful Research

 

 

 

 

 

 

UTAS Report 2000

Successful rural community development efforts focus on harnessing the resources already present to find community solutions to community concerns. For theseefforts to be successful, high levels of cooperation, communication and trust need to be built within the community.

This paper is based on a pilot study which investigated the role of the local school(s) in the process.acrobat: [ 2000 - 135KB]

The study found that not only do schools educate youth, but they perform a myriad of other functions within their communities, from providing physical resources such as facilities and equipment, to involving community members in the academic, sporting and cultural activities of the school, to encouraging youth and community members to work together to develop a greater understanding of their community and its potential.

As school and community work and learn together, relationships are built and strengthened, and networks, extending into and beyond the community, are established.

The study also investigated those factors which influence the nature and extent of a school’s contribution to its community, and found that leadership, both within the school and in the wider community, is central to the school-community partnership. A leadership philosophy which supports community participation and shared decision making ensures that relevant solutions are found to meet local community needs. This philosophy is based on the importance of relationship building and establishing networks. Community leadership processes which harness and develop existing schoolcommunity relationships and networks are therefore laying a solid foundation for rural community sustainability.

The discussion paper concludes:

 

 

 

 

Online Discussion Forums